Keep ERP and Planning. Consolidate the execution stack.
Lasya AI is a transaction-centric System of Execution. It consolidates fragmented procurement, TMS, control-tower and point-agent execution, and carries each transaction across company boundaries to a verified outcome.
ERP owns truth. Planning owns intent. Lasya AI owns completion.
Every system improved its function. The transaction still crosses all of them.
ERP, planning, procurement, TMS, control towers and AI agents each do their own job well. The purchase, the shipment and the invoice still break in the handoffs between them.
Planning
Creates intentProcurement
Issues the POTMS
Moves freightControl tower
Sees exceptionsWhat stays, what gets consolidated, and what is still missing.
Keep the systems that own truth and intent. Consolidate the execution tools that each own one slice of the transaction.
- KEEP
ERP
Remains the authoritative record for master data, controls, financial state and audit. Lasya AI writes the next verified state back to it.Not replacement. Division of responsibility. - KEEP
Planning suites
Remain the source of forecasts, scenarios and optimized intent. Lasya AI turns approved intent into coordinated execution.Planning creates intent. Execution carries it into the real world. - CONSOLIDATE
Procurement suites
Where scope fits, Lasya AI carries the transaction through supplier commitment and on into physical execution.A PO can be created while the commercial transaction is still unfinished. - REPLACE / CONSOLIDATE
TMS
For industrial supply chains, transaction-centric freight execution can take over the TMS stack. Specialized environments can keep an existing TMS.Transportation is part of the transaction, not the whole transaction. - CONSOLIDATE
Control towers
Sensing, recovery, verification and evidence move into one execution state where Lasya AI covers the requirement.Seeing the exception is different from owning its resolution. - ABSORB / CONSOLIDATE
Point AI agents
Agents work against a shared transaction state, policy, evidence and completion criteria instead of isolated silos.Agents are workers. The transaction is the unit of autonomy.
Different systems own different responsibilities.
Only one layer is built to hold a shared transaction state and carry it across companies to a verified outcome.
Scroll sideways on smaller screens to see every column.
A division of responsibility.
Execution continues across companies, and gets better each time.
- OUTSIDE YOUR COMPANY
The hardest execution boundaries are outside your company.
Partners don’t need to adopt Lasya AI. They keep working in the channels they already use, and every update lands on the same transaction.SuppliersCarriersForwardersCustoms brokersWarehousesEmailWhatsAppEDIAPIPortalOne transaction state - OPERATIONAL MEMORY
Execution history compounds, transaction by transaction.
Supplier behaviour, carrier performance, approvals and exception history stay with the transaction model, so the next one starts smarter. Nothing resets when the work moves from one function to the next.Transaction 1Supplier confirms lateTransaction 12Lead time learnedTransaction 40Carrier pattern knownTransaction 100+Exceptions anticipated
Keep. Consolidate. Extend. Complete.
- 01
Keep
ERP and planning stay as the record and the source of intent. - 02
Consolidate
Procurement, freight, control-tower and point-agent workflows move into one execution layer. - 03
Extend
Execution continues past your company boundary to suppliers, carriers and partners. - 04
Complete
Every transaction ends with a verified outcome written back to the ERP.
ERP owns truth. Planning owns intent. The System of Execution owns transaction completion.
Planning creates intent. Execution carries intent into the real world.
Planning suites remain complementary. They use demand, supply, inventory, capacity and constraints to determine what the enterprise should do. Lasya carries that approved intent through commitments, external-party actions, exceptions and verification.
Planning Suite
Forecast → Model → Optimize → RecommendLasya AI
Commit → Coordinate → Execute → Recover → Verify
- Planning
- Lasya execution
- ERP authoritative record
A procurement workflow can finish while the commercial transaction is still unfinished.
Procurement suites can provide deep sourcing, supplier-management, approval and purchasing capabilities. The boundary appears when the transaction must cross the supplier and continue into physical execution.
Functional procurement model
- RFQ or approval completes
- PO is created
- Supplier acknowledgement may still be pending
- Quantity or promise date may change
- Freight readiness starts in another workflow
Lasya transaction model
- Purchase intent stays attached to sourcing context
- RFQ, negotiation and approvals remain in one state
- Supplier commitment is verified
- Changed dates and quantities become governed exceptions
- The same transaction continues into freight readiness
- Purchase Intent
- Discover
- RFQ/RFI
- Negotiate
- PO
- Supplier Commitment
- Freight Readiness
PO created ≠ procurement completed. Procurement reaches its outcome when supplier commitment is verified.
Transportation is part of the transaction. It is not the whole transaction.
Modern TMS platforms can provide deep transportation planning and execution. Lasya also provides substantial freight capability, but its unit of execution is the larger business transaction.
For industrial supply chains, Lasya can replace the traditional TMS stack with transaction-centric freight execution.
For highly specialized environments with unique operational depth, an existing TMS can still participate where required. The architectural distinction remains: the transport workflow can end while the business transaction continues.
- Verified Supplier Commitment
- Pickup Readiness
- Carrier Sourcing
- Booking
- Dispatch
- Movement
- Customs
- Receipt
- ePOD
- Financial Evidence
- Settlement
Seeing the exception is different from owning its resolution.
Modern control towers can ingest events, identify risk, predict disruption, recommend responses and increasingly orchestrate interventions. The distinction is not dashboard versus action.
After the exception is detected, which system remains responsible until the recovered outcome is verified?
- Detect
- Assess impact
- Determine permitted recovery
- Coordinate partners
- Execute recovery
- Verify outcome
- Retain evidence
- Update system of record
Where Lasya provides the required sensing, decision context, governed action, partner coordination, recovery and verification, a separate control-tower layer can be consolidated.
Agents are workers. The transaction is the unit of autonomy.
Lasya uses specialized agents. The difference is that those agents work against one shared transaction state rather than creating another set of autonomous application silos.
Point-agent model
Procurement Agent → boundary → Logistics Agent → boundary → Finance AgentLasya model
One transaction state → Context + Policy + Authority + Evidence + Operational Memory → Specialized agents → Verified outcome
Point agents automate work. A System of Execution keeps the work accountable to one transaction.
Autonomous silos are still silos.
Procurement, transportation, customs and finance can each become increasingly agentic. That creates useful local autonomy. But if every application still owns only its own state, the transaction still needs continuity between them.
Agentic-silo model
Procurement Agent → boundary → Logistics Agent → boundary → Finance Agent. Each agent can complete a task while transaction context, policy, evidence and unresolved exceptions still have to cross the boundary.System of Execution model
One transaction state → specialized agents → systems + partners → verified outcome. Agents work against shared transaction context instead of creating another set of autonomous handoffs.
The transaction - not the application and not the agent - is the unit of autonomy.
The transaction should not reset when the function changes.
Lasya preserves the execution context that normally disappears between functional boundaries: decisions, commitments, partner responses, approvals, documents, shipment events, exceptions, recovery actions, evidence and verified outcomes.
- SOURCING & PROCUREMENT
Purchase Intent → Verified Supplier Commitment
Discovery, qualification, RFQ/RFI, bid normalization, negotiation, approvals, PO creation, acknowledgement and post-PO exception resolution. - FREIGHT, LOGISTICS & EXIM
Commitment → Verified Physical Execution
Shipment planning, carrier sourcing, tendering, booking, dispatch, movement, customs, receipt, ePOD and freight evidence. - FINANCE OPERATIONS
Execution Evidence → Verified Financial Closure
Invoice intake, PO/receipt/rate validation, matching, governed variances, approvals, settlement workflow and ERP posting.
- Purchase Intent
- Verified Supplier Commitment
- Verified Physical Execution
- Verified Financial Closure
- ERP Authoritative Record
What is a System of Execution?
A System of Execution carries a transaction from intent to verified outcome across applications, functions, companies and communication channels while maintaining transaction state, context, policy, evidence, ownership and exception continuity.
Lasya AI is Settyl's System of Execution for supply chains.
System of Execution, answered.
No. ERP remains the system of record. Lasya AI runs the work between systems and partners and writes verified outcomes back to the ERP.
No. Planning creates the intent: forecasts, scenarios and the optimized plan. Lasya AI carries that approved intent into coordinated execution.
Yes, where its native sourcing and procurement execution covers the scope you need. It also carries the transaction past the PO, through supplier commitment and physical execution.
For industrial supply chains, yes. Specialized transport environments can keep an existing TMS and interoperate with Lasya AI.
Control towers focus on visibility and intervention. Lasya AI owns the execution itself, through recovery, verification and evidence.
Agents perform tasks. Lasya AI keeps the shared transaction state, policy and completion criteria that agents work within.
No. Partners take part through the channels they already use, such as email, WhatsApp, EDI, APIs and portals.
Depending on scope: sourcing, freight, EXIM, control-tower, exception, invoice, settlement and point AI workflows. ERP and planning remain.
Fewer internal handoffs, and execution that continues across company boundaries until a verified outcome is reached.
Give the transaction one execution system.
Keep your ERP and planning tools. Bring us the transaction that crosses the most systems today, and we will show how Lasya AI carries it to a verified outcome.